Information-Theoretic Foundations of Entanglement Learning and Artificial Intelligence

Entanglement, Information & Intelligence

Entanglement Learning (EL) draws from classical communication theory to redefine intelligence:

Information Throughput: The agent’s bidirectional channel capacity—the maximum rate it can reliably exchange information with its environment.
Entanglement: Dynamic source and channel coding, structuring internal representations and actions to optimize transmission with the environment.
The Adaptive Edge: Unlike fixed coding in traditional systems, designed for predictable noise and bandwidth, EL adapts coding continuously to sustain information throughput amid unpredictable shifts.
Entanglement Metrics: Real-time gauges of transmission efficiency, showing how well information flows.
Information Gradients: Reconfiguration signals that adjust parameters to restore or boost the information channel capacity.

From this view, intelligence is the sustained optimization of a bidirectional communication between an agent and its environment—where adaptation emerges naturally from maximizing information throughput. This isn’t just an analogy—it’s EL’s mathematical backbone. Built on information theory’s rigorous principles, EL offers a precise, scalable structure for quantifying and enhancing intelligent behavior.

Why Entanglement?

Entanglement Learning (EL) posits that intelligence stems from entanglement—the sustained, predictable connection between an agent and its environment. Drawing from communication theory, we extend Schrödinger’s 1948 insight: entanglement means knowing an agent’s state (e.g., its actions) fully predicts environmental outcomes, and knowing those outcomes predicts the agent’s next actions.

In EL, this bidirectional, or mutual predictability across interaction cycles defines entanglement, measured in bits via mutual information. Stronger entanglement enhances an agent’s ability to anticipate and influence its surroundings.

We propose that information reflects this entanglement level, serving as a universal alignment metric. Intelligence, then, emerges as the continuous optimization of this information flow, enabling adaptation without external guidance.

Entanglemnt

Beyond Optimization

Current AI systems optimize for objectives—but lack a universal principle to keep them aligned with their environment.

Entanglement Learning introduces that missing law: a structural information constraint that enables systems to maintain coherence across tasks and conditions—just as physical systems obey thermodynamic laws while pursuing efficiency.

Entropy

H(A) = -∑ p(a) log₂ p(a)

H(S) = -∑ p(s) log₂ p(s)

H(S') = -∑ p(s') log₂ p(s')

Mutual Information

MI(S;A) = H(S) + H(A) - H(S,A)

MI(A;S') = H(A) + H(S') - H(A,S')

MI(S;S') = H(S) + H(S') - H(S,S')

Defining the Entanglement Metrics

At the mathematical core of Entanglement Learning lies a fundamental visualization: the three-entropy Venn diagram that maps information relationships between an agent and its environment. This diagram represents how information is distributed and shared across the agent's interaction cycle, providing the foundation for all entanglement metrics.

The diagram consists of three overlapping circles, each representing the entropy (uncertainty) of a key component in the agent-environment interaction:

H(S): The entropy of the agent's observation states, representing the uncertainty in what the agent perceives from the environment. This encompasses the distribution of possible inputs the agent might encounter.
H(A): The entropy of the agent's action states, capturing the uncertainty in what actions the agent might take. This reflects the distribution of possible decisions or outputs from the agent's internal processing.
H(S'): The entropy of the resulting states, representing the uncertainty in how the environment responds to the agent's actions. This encompasses the distribution of possible next states that might occur.

The relationships between these entropies—represented by the overlapping regions in the diagram—reveal the information structure of the agent-environment interaction. The pairwise overlaps represent mutual information between two components:

MI(S;A): The mutual information between observations and actions, measuring how much the agent's actions are informed by its observations. This reflects how effectively the agent's decision policy leverages input information.
MI(A;S'): The mutual information between actions and resulting states, measuring how much the agent's actions influence future states. This captures the agent's causal impact on its environment.
MI(S;S'): The mutual information between current and future observations, measuring the natural predictability inherent in the environment regardless of the agent's actions. This reflects environmental stability and consistency.

Entanglement (psi, ψ)

The central region where all three circles overlap represents the three-way mutual information MI(S,A;S'), which forms the basis for our core entanglement metric. This central overlap quantifies how much information is shared across the entire interaction cycle—how effectively current observations and actions jointly predict future states.

The mathematical beauty of this representation is that changes in the environment, agent architecture, or their interaction manifest as measurable shifts in these entropy relationships. When an agent optimally aligns with its environment, we typically observe:

Decreasing marginal entropies (the circles become smaller)
Increasing mutual information (the overlaps become larger relative to the circles)
Growing central overlap (more information is shared across the entire interaction)

This visualization transforms abstract information relationships into an intuitive map that guides our understanding of agent-environment alignment and forms the foundation for the specific entanglement metrics we'll explore next.

ψ = MI(S,A;S') = H(S,A) + H(S') - H(S,A,S')

Dynamic Tension: Uncertainty vs. Entanglement

The entropy circles in this visualization exist in a state of dynamic tension. Environmental uncertainty continuously acts to increase individual entropies and push the circles apart (upper diagram), creating disorder and reducing predictability. Simultaneously, intelligence works in the opposite direction—reducing entropy by creating structured relationships that pull the circles together, (lower diagram) increasing their overlap.

This perpetual tension between expanding entropy and contracting entanglement captures the fundamental nature of intelligence as a process that creates order against the backdrop of increasing environmental uncertainty.

Adaptive agents continuously work to maintain maximum overlap despite this entropy-expanding pressure, restructuring their internal representations to preserve information throughput as conditions change.

Entanglement Asymmetry (lambda psi, Λψ)

Entanglement Asymmetry (Λψ) reveals critical directional imbalances in information flow that remain invisible to traditional metrics. By comparing how strongly actions predict outcomes [MI(A;S')] versus how strongly states inform actions [MI(S;A)], this metric exposes whether misalignment originates in perception or control.

Positive asymmetry (Λψ > 0) indicates that actions predict outcomes better than states predict actions—suggesting the system's internal representations inadequately capture input patterns while control mechanisms remain effective.

Negative asymmetry (Λψ < 0) reveals the opposite: strong internal models paired with ineffective control policies. This diagnostic precision enables targeted intervention, directing adaptation toward specific system components rather than wasteful full-system recalibration.

When tracked over time, asymmetry gradients provide early warning of emerging misalignments before they manifest as performance degradation.

Λψ = MI(A;S') - MI(S;A)

= [H(A) + H(S') - H(A,S')] - [H(S) + H(A) - H(S,A)]

= H(S,A) - H(A,S') + H(S') - H(S)

μψ = MI(S;S') = H(S) + H(S') - H(S,S')

Entanglement Memory (mu psi, μψ)

Entanglement Memory (μψ) quantifies the temporal stability of information relationships across the agent’s interaction cycles. While traditional metrics capture momentary correlations, μψ tracks how long predictive structures—such as mutual information between states and outcomes—persist over time.

It compares the consistency of entanglement across time windows, revealing whether the agent's internal model maintains a reliable mapping of the environment or continually re-learns unstable patterns. High memory (μψ → 1) indicates that the system's representations and control strategies remain coherent across episodes, supporting efficient and robust adaptation.

Low memory (μψ → 0) signals volatility—either due to environmental non-stationarity or internal model fragility—prompting re-evaluation of model structure or discretization.

By monitoring entanglement memory, systems can detect temporal drift in alignment, enabling preemptive recalibration before failure accumulates, and promoting long-term informational stability in complex or dynamic environments.

The EL Reference Technical Paper

This document provides formal definitions for the core components of Entanglement Learning (EL)—including information throughput, base entanglement (ψ), asymmetry (Λψ), and memory (μψ)—as well as architectural elements like the Information Digital Twin (IDT). It is designed as a technical reference for researchers and practitioners working with adaptive AI systems.

Have questions about the math or how it applies to your use case?
Use the AI assistant built into this site (look for the chat button below) to:

Ask about metric definitions or equations
Get examples tailored to CNNs, MPC, RL, and more
Explore how EL adapts in real time

You can also use external assistants like Claude, ChatGPT, or Grok by uploading this PDF—but for the most direct experience, our on-site assistant is optimized to respond using the exact documents, use cases, and EL logic developed by Semarx.

EL Reference